Guest Post by: Craig Churchill - Head of the Microinsurance Innovation Facility, International Labour Organization (ILO)
MiBanco, Peru, and the insurance company it now owns, Protecta.
Craig Churchill is the head of the ILO's Microinsurance Innovation Facility, launched in 2008 with a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to promote better insurance products for more low-income households. In this post, he evaluates the pros and cons of implementing microinsurance policies, and offers specific guidelines that MFIs can follow to increase their leverage and negotiating power.
Many microfinance institutions (MFIs) are looking beyond credit to see what other financial services they can offer their clients, and in those discussions insurance invariably is raised as a possible option. But should an MFI get involved in offering insurance?
When microfinance institutions are interested in insurance, their primary motivation is often to reduce their credit risk in the event that borrowers or their family members experience death, illness or other losses. If insurance can help protect the households in such circumstances, it will indirectly safeguard the MFI’s portfolio.
Another significant motivation behind the interest in insurance is to improve the welfare of their clients. MFIs typically have dual missions to alleviate poverty or promote economic development while generating a profit (or covering their costs). The social mission of improving the welfare of poor households can be enhanced through the protection provided by insurance.
There are also a number of legitimately commercial reasons why MFIs might be interested in providing insurance, such as enhancing retention, improving product profitability, diversifying their income streams and reaching out to new markets.

