Posted by: Taea Calcut
In our last post, we discussed some of the ways in which MFIs demonstrate and prioritize social responsibility to the communities where they work. Today, we ask what exogenous factors might determine the likelihood that MFIs have formal social responsibility to the community (SRC) policies.
MIX Social Performance Report data on SRC policies remains limited at this time, given the small sample size of self-reporting MFIs. However, we can explore correlations between MFIs' SRC policies and world region, working environment (i.e., rural, semi-urban, and urban), and regulatory status on preliminary basis.
So, what does the preliminary data reveal?
Table 1: MFIs with Written SRC Policies by World Region (n=133)
For the purposes of our review, we have defined MFIs having an SRC policy as those with written policies, rather than informal policies or policies under development. In Table 1, we find that the data reveals little variation between MFIs with SRC policies by region at this time. (When “policy” is expanded to include written and informal policies, each region reports a majority of MFIs with SRC policies, yet the variations between regions remains similarly small.)

